With the new developer build - available here - you must enable integrated Flash with a command line flag. The version of both currently sits at 32.0.0. One of the many questions that remain is whether Chrome will give users the option of not installing Flash. FWIW, both Adobe's FlashPlayer - the original, NPAPI plugin that can trace its roots all the way back to NetScape Navigator - and also PepperFlash Google's own later, more secure PPAPI development of the plug-in, are both available for download from Adobe's site. Presumably, the company sees this as a way to ingratiate existing Flash shops who've been shunned by the Apple cult leader. Native Client and the new NPAPI have been brewing for months upon months, but today's Chrome announcement would seem to be a conscious answer to Steve Jobs' hard-and-fast stance on Flash. "This will allow pages to use Native Client modules for a number of the purposes that browser plugins are currently used for, while significantly increasing their safety," Google said when the new API was first announced. The new setup was developed in part to make it easier for developers to use NPAPI in tandem with Native Client. "This new API aims to address the shortcomings of the current browser plug-in model."
#SHOULD I HAVE BOTH ADOBE FLASH 20 AND 20 NPAPI ON COMPUTER PDF#
If the Firefox version of Flash is not installed and you open a PDF file that includes Flash (SWF) content, a dialog will prompt the user to install the latest Flash Player.
![should i have both adobe flash 20 and 20 npapi on computer should i have both adobe flash 20 and 20 npapi on computer](https://i.imgur.com/DJLOrzY.jpg)
This can lead to incompatibilities, reduction in performance and some security headaches," Google said today. Adobe Reader 9.x users no longer have to update Adobe Reader each time there is an update to Flash.
![should i have both adobe flash 20 and 20 npapi on computer should i have both adobe flash 20 and 20 npapi on computer](https://www.ghacks.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/firefox-npapi-plugins.jpg)
The browser plug-in interface is loosely specified, limited in capability and varies across browsers and operating systems. "The traditional browser plug-in model has enabled tremendous innovation on the web, but it also presents challenges for both plug-ins and browsers.